RufioCas said:
Klaas Vaak said:
RufioCas said:
Hm, let's think.
2 passwords, 1 for non-important websites, 1 for important websites. If I get hacked on a non-important website, my important passwords will still be safe and secure.
Oh look, there is also a "Remember me" function, how does that work again?!
Oh look, I can also create a password similar to my original one so it won't be a pain in the ass to remember them all!
Nope, let's not take any precautions and cry when I get hacked on a non-professional server. Also try not to use that thumbsup emoji when you didn't make a smart remark.
That's basically saying I should give my bank account number with pin to a company like Sony, isn't it?
Because everyone knows no fucktards & money wolves ever worked there.
That made absolutely no sense.
"

"
This isn't a massive corporation hence why they won't be taking security DAMN SERIOUS. You can't blame a handful of guys trying their best to keep a server running. It's your own fault, you are responsible for your password's security. Only thing a company can do is hashing your password, which was probably(?) the case already.
I'm pretty sure you didn't really understand what I just said. Or what you just said, for that matter.
What I was saying is that if you keep using the same password for every 'serious' and 'important' website there's still that chance of some company being hacked and getting the passwords out there.
Thus using a different password for every website would be best, but equals the 20 pages of different passwords.
Didn't that stuff happen to Adobe, or some company like that, once?
Lighten up a bit, man. You seem frustrated as hell.
EDIT: As I just saw your reply on my reply to Austin.
What the fuck does the fact that you're a computer engineer have to do with this? I was talking about a completely different aspect.
Please lighten the fuck up.